Briefly explain the “pros and cons” of the electoral system. Why do we have the electoral system?

Write a paragraph answering each question.

How are the number of electoral votes decided for each state? How many electoral votes are in the state of Texas? Which Presidential candidate (Obama or Romney) won Texas electoral votes in the 2012 election?
Briefly explain the “pros and cons” of the electoral system. Why do we have the electoral system? What are some arguments against it?
Explain what you think. Should the U.S. maintain the current Electoral College system, move toward a national popular vote system, or use the “proportional voting” system for the Electoral College used by Maine and Nebraska?

Explore 3 stereotypes you may have encountered about those in the lower socio-economic brackets.

 

Investigate the impact of classism on good management practices, especially those focusing on the inclusive workplace.

Use the following points as a guideline for this written assignment, and plan to research and correctly cite your sources in APA format. 

 

  1. Explore 3 stereotypes you may have encountered about those in the lower socio-economic brackets.
  2. For each stereotype that you share, investigate the impact that the stereotype has on your workforce (e.g., negative attitudes, low numbers hired, discriminatory practices).
  3. Next, share an awareness strategy for each stereotype that you can use to combat that bias in your employees and yourself. You must share a different strategy for each stereotype, for a total of three strategies.
  4. Share 2-3 management strategies you can use to integrate the perspectives of those in the lower socioeconomic brackets into the diverse and inclusive workforce.

Describe at least two social experiences that affected your personal development so the reader understands how the concepts are being applied.

Prepare a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you examine the concept of the self. Address the following items:

  • Paper must be written in 3rd person; only area one is permitted to write in 1st person is the two personal experiences.  There is a 3 point deduction for writing in 1st person.
  • Define the concept of the self in the social world according to Myers and sources.
  • Apply the self to ones life, including self-concept, self-esteem, and self-efficacy; employ Myers and additional soruces to support your ideas.
  • Describe at least two social experiences that affected your personal development so the reader understands how the concepts are being applied.

Include Myers and at least two additional references in your paper.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Describe at least two social experiences that affected your personal development so the reader understands how the concepts are being applied.

Prepare a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you examine the concept of the self. Address the following items:

  • Paper must be written in 3rd person; only area one is permitted to write in 1st person is the two personal experiences.  There is a 3 point deduction for writing in 1st person.
  • Define the concept of the self in the social world according to Myers and sources.
  • Apply the self to ones life, including self-concept, self-esteem, and self-efficacy; employ Myers and additional soruces to support your ideas.
  • Describe at least two social experiences that affected your personal development so the reader understands how the concepts are being applied.

Include Myers and at least two additional references in your paper.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Identify your ethical scenario and how it relates to your project that answers the following.

In paper format, analyze one of the many engineering ethics case studies provided by the Texas A&M University (TAMU) Civil Engineering Ethics workshop, “Teaching Engineering Ethics:  A Case Study Approach.”[1]  The written description of the case study may include a discussion of the underlying ethical issues and courses of action.  You are not simply copying these down as part of your paper, they are only food for thought to the problem.  Consider all the information presented in the case study, synthesize it, and answer the questions provided in the outline below.

Half of this assignment will be graded on how well you addressed the fundamental ethical questions.  The second half will be graded on writing quality.  This assignment should not exceed 5 pages at 1.5 spacing and 12 point font.

  1. Project and Scenario Introduction

1.1.  Identify your ethical scenario and how it relates to your project that answers the following:

–        Who are the stakeholders?

–        What are the relevant facts to the scenario?

–        What do you feel is missing from the information provided that you would like to know?

  1. Ethical Codes and Theories

2.1.  Identify relevant professional codes of ethics related to your scenario

2.2.  Identify relevant ethical theories related to your scenario

  1. Alternatives Generation and Comparison

3.1.  Identify at least three alternative actions to your scenario

–        What are the consequences to each action?

3.2.  Discuss how this scenario and your alternative actions might affect the stakeholders

3.3.  Evaluate those alternative actions by applying the professional codes of ethics and ethical theories

–        Note: each could have competing reasoning based on the code/theory selected

  1. Action Selection and Justification.

4.1.  After carefully evaluating your options, select an action

4.2.  Justify your decision thoroughly

Discuss the findings of the authors. How would a different research approach have affected the findings?

Choose a topic covered in this course (ie stress, strain, torsion fatigue etc.) and research new advancements/technology related to the topic and provide a 2-3 page summary of your findings. The requirements for the project summary are as follows:

 

  • Summarize the objective of the project/discovery; how the objective was accomplished; and the findings of the research
  • In order to demonstrate that you thoroughly reviewed the researched project, after your summary you must provide a “personal reflection”. The personal reflection may include the following:
    • Discuss your opinion of the research approach. What assumptions were made? How did their assumptions affect the results? What could the authors have done differently to attain better data?
    • Discuss the findings of the authors. How would a different research approach have affected the findings?
    • What were some of the limitations of the study? How would the limitations affect the results?
    • Discuss how the project relates or translates into some of the work you have done or to the classes you have taken.
    • What did you learn from this research project?