Author: chris

In order to make a profit,companies need to promote their products to consumers and convince them to buy.What are three ways companies can attract consumers?

Using the HIMSS Stage 1 MU matrix at http://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/public/HIMSSorg/Content/files/MU_HIE_Matrix.pdf
and compare it to the Stage 2 MU matrix at
http://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-himss/files/production/public/HIMSSorg/Content/files/MU2_HIE_Matrix_FINAL.pdf
Create your own matrix using 10 different MU objectives and their measures. What is difference between the two? Then summarize your impressions are by reviewing these two documents in summary paragraph form.

Re-Read Pages 198-209 in Smart Data on VAMTA. Write a paragraph scenario in which you describe how you would use Colored Petri Nets and Protege to illustrate this scenario. How will functions and methods be useful in this project? Discuss the major points in these Function & Methods videos. The design document and implementation will be a team effort. Begin to think about team assignments. Be resourceful and innovative in your approach

When answering these essay questions, please follow the scientific method format of Title, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Analysis, Results, Conclusions, Recommendations, Future issues and references. Writing the requisite one paragraph will get you the minimum grade. Please expand beyond this minimal effort and in addition, please provide rigorous references.

1.What are some important common features between race music and hillbilly music?
2.How did the East Texas style of bluesman Blind Lemon Jefferson differ from the Mississippi Delta style of bluesman Charley Patton?.
3.What are the common musical features of the twelve-bar blues? Use examples.

Please complete the questions on the strategy outline document according to the EAZY\’S GARAGE negotiation case document.

Sometimes, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to find a platform where you can express
your concerns about an issue—i.e. in our case, science-related issues—or where
researchers can make important announcements or report significant research findings.
Letters to journal editors are an important genre that enables writers to do any of these.
Essentially, your goal in this assignment is to compose a 3-4-page letter to an editor of a
science journal doing one of the following (see pages 119-121 in our course textbook for
more ideas):

 Report a major research finding to the scientific community. For example, if your
research just found a cure for AIDS, it will be worth reporting. Basically, if you
are conducting or have conducted some research, you might want to share the
results with the readership of the journal. It will be helpful for you to review
prior research on your topic to help readers understand the context and
importance of your findings. Then, move on to describe the purpose of your
research, the methods used, the findings, and why they are important to the
scientific community. Be sure to also highlight what questions remain to be
addressed on the topic your investigated.

 Choose a contemporary scientific issue that is of concern to you and express
your concerns about it (these include but not limited to: scientific ethics,
plagiarism, privacy, language used in reporting scientific results, fair use policy,
etc.). If you have no specific issue in mind, you might read through several
scientific magazines for ideas on what topic interests you (here is a link to some
science journals: http://www.world-newspapers.com/science.html).

 React to the major argument or issues raised in an article in a peer reviewed
journal. In doing this, you might decide to agree or disagree with the author on
issues raised in the article. An effective way to do this is to read the article in
question carefully, understand what the main arguments are, and then compose
your letter accordingly.

Some Ideas and requirements

 Target a journal you would like to address your letter to and read several of the
articles in the journal (here is a link to some journals:
http://highwire.stanford.edu/top/journals.dtl).

 Review the guidelines for the “letter to the editor” section of that journal and
compose your letter based on the set of guidelines.

 Note that this letter is not merely an opinionated or emotional letter; when you
make claims, try to support them with credible secondary sources. Use at least three
sources to support your discussions and arguments.

 Read some sample letters to the editor in the journal you chose.

 If you are reacting to the arguments in an article, choose the viewpoint from which
you will be writing.

 Construct an outline of your letter.

 Provide both in-text citations or reference page using either APA or MLA
consistently

 Include your name, address, email address and phone number at the top of your
letter. Editors often require this information because they will need to verify your
identity. You can state that this information is not to be published.

 Be concise and focused. Write your letter in pithy, clever statements, but remember
that this easy to do! You will probably need to write several drafts of your letter to
condense your message.

 Follow the format stipulated in the journal, but is a general help:
a. In your first paragraph, introduce your problem and sum up your
objection.
b. In the second paragraph, include a few sentences to support your
view.
c. End with a great summary and a clever, punchy line.

 13. Proofread your letter. Editors will ignore letters that contain bad grammar and
poorly-written rants

Follow all the instructions

1000 words response to the follow question:
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the author’s main assertion that “reflection, or thinking things over, finds its proper moment after rather than before an act?” Be sure to support your ideas with specific details, examples, and illustrations along with thoughtful discussion.

All the details, examples come from movie “Jet Li’s Fearless”.

Watch movie “Jet Li’s Fearless”.

Professor talked about idea:
Think first then doing things;
or do things first and then think;
or you can combine with the film plot and write it.

It’s all legal to write, but should have a specific topic about your idea, and transition should be coherently.
Essay should be simple, Chinese culture, Chinese grammar, use some Chinese popular aphorisms.

I upload a example of introduction, please have a look.

Follow all the instructions

1000 words response to the follow question:
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the author’s main assertion that “reflection, or thinking things over, finds its proper moment after rather than before an act?” Be sure to support your ideas with specific details, examples, and illustrations along with thoughtful discussion.

All the details, examples come from movie “Jet Li’s Fearless”.

Watch movie “Jet Li’s Fearless”.

Professor talked about idea:
Think first then doing things;
or do things first and then think;
or you can combine with the film plot and write it.

It’s all legal to write, but should have a specific topic about your idea, and transition should be coherently.
Essay should be simple, Chinese culture, Chinese grammar, use some Chinese popular aphorisms.

I upload a example of introduction, please have a look.

In this course, we will be reading a wide variety of literary works drawn from different time periods and diverse cultures. Each week, you will submit one reflection paper that reflects on that week’s readings. This assignment is not a book report where you summarize the story’s plot and characters and it is not a review where you simply state whether or not you liked the reading. Instead, you should demonstrate a high level of engagement with the text(s) by exploring themes, analyzing characters, comparing/contrasting form and style, and more. You may choose to write in depth about a single text or draw your analysis from multiple works. You will be graded on how well you establish a strong thesis and successfully defend that thesis with examples from the text(s). Weekly reflection papers are due every Friday by 11:59 PM (unless otherwise indicated on the syllabus) and should be submitted via the Turnitin drop box on Moodle.

Each reflection must:

1. Be at least 2 pages (Approximately 500 words) in Times New Roman 12 Point font, double spaced with 1 inch margins.

2. Show evidence of having read the assigned material for that week by establishing a strong thesis that demonstrates creativity and insight in your analysis of the readings. It is not enough to simply summarize the reading, but you must show that you can thoughtfully engage with the text.

3. Include support for your analysis through specific quotes from the readings. (Citations should be in MLA format).

4. Be free of spelling, grammar, and other errors.

Remember: This is not a research paper. Instead, your reflections should be a close reading and analysis of the specific texts that you choose from that week’s readings. Therefore, all quotations and examples should come directly from the class textbook and should be cited correctly. No other outside sources should be included in the paper. Evidence of plagiarism (including self-plagiarism) or cheating (unauthorized collaboration, submitting another student’s work as your own, or other fraud) will result in severe penalties. Refer to the syllabus for more information on the Academic Integrity policy.

Weekly Reflection Paper Grading (Each = 25 Points Possible)

ATTRIBUTE Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor
Unsatisfactory or Incomplete
1. Student’s response meets the requirements of the assignment (required length, includes insightful analysis, etc.).
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points
2. Student’s response demonstrates understanding of the assigned reading with specific quotes and examples from the text
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points
3. Student’s response is clear and logical in sequence and content
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points
4. Student’s analysis is creative, insightful, and/or demonstrates engagement with the readings
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points
5. Content is free of spelling or grammatical errors with citations in correct MLA format

In this course, we will be reading a wide variety of literary works drawn from different time periods and diverse cultures. Each week, you will submit one reflection paper that reflects on that week’s readings. This assignment is not a book report where you summarize the story’s plot and characters and it is not a review where you simply state whether or not you liked the reading. Instead, you should demonstrate a high level of engagement with the text(s) by exploring themes, analyzing characters, comparing/contrasting form and style, and more. You may choose to write in depth about a single text or draw your analysis from multiple works. You will be graded on how well you establish a strong thesis and successfully defend that thesis with examples from the text(s). Weekly reflection papers are due every Friday by 11:59 PM (unless otherwise indicated on the syllabus) and should be submitted via the Turnitin drop box on Moodle.

Each reflection must:

1. Be at least 2 pages (Approximately 500 words) in Times New Roman 12 Point font, double spaced with 1 inch margins.

2. Show evidence of having read the assigned material for that week by establishing a strong thesis that demonstrates creativity and insight in your analysis of the readings. It is not enough to simply summarize the reading, but you must show that you can thoughtfully engage with the text.

3. Include support for your analysis through specific quotes from the readings. (Citations should be in MLA format).

4. Be free of spelling, grammar, and other errors.

Remember: This is not a research paper. Instead, your reflections should be a close reading and analysis of the specific texts that you choose from that week’s readings. Therefore, all quotations and examples should come directly from the class textbook and should be cited correctly. No other outside sources should be included in the paper. Evidence of plagiarism (including self-plagiarism) or cheating (unauthorized collaboration, submitting another student’s work as your own, or other fraud) will result in severe penalties. Refer to the syllabus for more information on the Academic Integrity policy.

Weekly Reflection Paper Grading (Each = 25 Points Possible)

ATTRIBUTE Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor
Unsatisfactory or Incomplete
1. Student’s response meets the requirements of the assignment (required length, includes insightful analysis, etc.).
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points
2. Student’s response demonstrates understanding of the assigned reading with specific quotes and examples from the text
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points
3. Student’s response is clear and logical in sequence and content
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points
4. Student’s analysis is creative, insightful, and/or demonstrates engagement with the readings
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points
5. Content is free of spelling or grammatical errors with citations in correct MLA format