Author: chris

500 words!!!
For apa title pageSeveral of your courses may ask you to “reflect” on readings and/or write a reflection paper or essay. The general idea is for you to read, view, or do something, and then figure out what it means to you. Some of your writing is devoted to analyzing what you read, viewed or did, and some of it is devoted to its meaning for you. In your reflection, read three essays in your text (The Norton Reader). Select from the list noted in the “Readings and Preparation” section above. Then write a reflection, using the headings below. Your reflection should be a minimum of 500 words. This assignment will also help you become accustomed to the style of essays in your text for this course. The minimum word requirement for this assignment is a bit shorter than others in the course, which are a minimum of 750 words. This difference is intentional to help you adjust to the style of work in the course. You will be reading essays throughout the course.Headings for Reflection Essay:
Introduction
In your introduction, address the readings you chose and why you selected them.
Challenges of the Readings
Under this heading, explain two or more challenges that you had while reading. These challenges can be anything from finding yourself distracted or finding a need to re-read passages. Include how you might face these challenges when you read additional essays later in the class.
Highlight of Readings
Under this heading, explain two or more highlights of the readings. What did you learn, like or discover, and what surprised you? Were there any assumptions you held before you read the essays? If so, did these assumptions change after reading them? Please elaborate.
Ask the Author
Imagine that you have an opportunity to follow up with one of these authors and ask them to tell you more. What would you ask and why?
Your Personal Account or Journal Plan
Think about what you would write about if you were to write a personal account or journal plan. What would you write about and why? How would it be different or similar to the accounts or journals you read?
Save your paper as a doc or rtf with your name and the assignment name in the file, using Last Name_Assignment. So, if your name were Alicia Jackson, and this is Reflection Essay, you would title it Jackson_Reflection. Upload your paper by clicking the “WEEK 1 ASSIGNMENT – REFLECTION ESSAY” link above.From the CLIENT:Also in the reflection essay if above each paragraph he titles in bold each item he’s talking about introduction , challenges of the readings, etc the five points he goes overReflection Essay Sabrina Rindels Brandman University LBSU 304 Liberal Arts Core Foundations Professor Lindsay Ludvigsen May 7, 2016 – for the title page

See attached info (the proposal is what I’m going to write about in my research paper its basically a guide that maps out verbatim what is going to be on the research paper)
“THIS IS THE CRITERIA FOR THE PAPER AND I AM SENDING YOU WHAT I WANT TO WRITE ABOUT THROUGH A FILE THIS IS FOR MY WOMEN STUDIES CLASS” PART IV: Long Analysis Paper
(Late submissions will not be accepted)ASSIGNMENT:
For this final paper, students are responsible for developing their own research paper topics, by
extending their short paper four assignment. This will be a formal paper assignment and requires the
use of four (4) reputable outside sources.
PROMPT:
Using the topic approved by the instructor, build on your short paper four and include extended
analysis and counter arguments. This is a formal academic paper, so pay special attention to the
format expectations that follow.
PAPER FORMAT:
Please note that points will be deducted for failure to adhere to the following format:
Proper heading (top left-hand corner with student name, course number, Reaction #2
and date)
Centered original title
6 pages typed and double-spaced (minimum page length, must be a full page)
Essay-style of writing (paragraphs that are linked together that address the prompt- NO
Q&A style format)
Introduction that includes thesis as the last sentence.
Body paragraphs that effectively support thesis, using examples from the source
materials.
1 source from the text book and 3 reputable outside sources
1-inch margins all around
12-inch font (Times New Roman)
Third-person point of view
At least one source from the textbook and two additional sources from outside and
reputable sources
APA parenthetical in-text citations
Works Cited page (when applicable-does not count towards final page count)
Final Draft should be submitted via Blackboard as a Word document. File should be saved as
“Last name_First Initial_Essay1” (Ex: Okedeyi_R_Essay1.doc).
PLEASE NOTE: Students who fail to name their files appropriately will receive point deductions.
Work that is not submitted as a Word document will not be accepted, and will receive a zero
(0) grade. The same evaluative measures used for weekly discussion will apply.
Structural Suggestions
Introduction- In the opening paragraph, you should identify the issue that you are
analyzing. Make sure that any relevant historical, social or cultural background
information that is needed to follow your analysis is presented in the introduction.
Given that this is a minimum five-page paper, your introduction should be at least one
page in length. The introduction should also include a thesis statement that identifies
the main purpose of your essay. Finally, use the introduction to grab your reader’s
attention; create a sense of expectation that makes readers want to continue on to
discover the insights of your analysis.
Body- The body of the research paper should develop the thesis in detail by exploring 2-
4 subtopics and utilizing the three required reading sources. Quotes from the readings
should be used to support your claims, along with any relevant keywords. However, be
sure to avoid writing an essay that strings together too many quotations without
establishing a context for what the quoted passages are designed to illustrate.
Conclusion- The conclusion should sum up the essay without being repetitious. In the
final paragraph of the essay, you should also draw some conclusions on the overall
impact of the literary work on you as a reader. Think of the future implications of what
you have argued or what is to be gained, if you are making a case for a proposal.

Based on your reading in Chapters 14-15 in Living with Art, respond to the TWO questions below. Then for each question, respond to one of your peers. Your responses should be “mini-essays” ranging from 175-300 words per question.

In prepartion for this Discussion Board, be sure to review the Power Point, “How to Write a Comparison”. This mini-lecture will help you in responding to any of these questions.

In responding to the questions for each discussion board, you are expected to select specific examples of art works from the text book to illustrate and support your points—these supporting examples of art works should be different from those that the author of the course text uses when discussing similar themes or issues. Include the artist, title and page number of the each work of art you use. You may also find images of art works on the internet. If you do so, include the link and source information.

Comment on at least two of your peers’ posts; please remember to indicate to whom or to which post your peer comments are directed. Comments should be substantive, with supported critical analysis. Supported means offering specific examples of art or quotes, or historic information to support your ideas. Include citations for your sources.

Try looking in other chapters of the course text, even those that are not assigned; you will find a wealth of images throughout the book. It should be part of your learning experience in this course to learn to LOOK at works of art and to see not only what the experts see, but also to experience a work of art for yourself and to discover what you find there.

Also, remember that if you copy or paraphrase word or ideas from the text or other sources, make sure that you follow appropriate procedures for crediting those sources. Put any quoted text in quotation marks “” and follow it with the source in parenthesis (). Citing incorrectly will reduce your grade and may be considered plagiarism. You must cite your sources in MLA format at the end of each response. Review announcements on how to cite correctly.

from the text or that do little more than repeat other students’ posts will not receive high marks. Originality and critical thought are the goals here.

linked item Week Two Discussion
Part I: Distinguish between the Paleolithic and Neolithic Periods in terms of time and cultural developments. Compare and contrast specific examples of artifacts, practices, and systems of belief. Discuss why art survives or does not. Include the four reasons Getlein cites for how art survives, giving an example of art work from both the Paleolithic and Neolithic Periods that meet one of these requirements. What types of art work or materials would not likely survive? How might this affect our opinion of a culture?

Part II: Describe the shift in the Roman Empire that created Byzantium in the East and what would eventually become Europe in the West and explain the impact of this political, religious, and social split on the art produced in these regions in this era. Provide specific examples of particular works of art or architecture to illustrate your points. Second, trace the subsequent development of art in the East and the West from the Early through the High and Late Middle Ages by citing specific works of art or architecture and describing characteristic features these works exemplify. Be sure to include the each of the following terms in your discussion:

animal style
Carolingian
Romanesque
Gothic
Deadlines:
Thursday evening: Initial response
Saturday evening: Respond to two peers (100+ words per follow-up post)

Preparation

Reflect on what you have read about RPZ Marketing. Think about what you see as the company’s current strengths and opportunities, as well as its potential weaknesses and threats. Choose an aspect of the business that interests you enough to study it further. Make some initial notes about how you might state a specific problem currently facing RPZ. Here is an example of the kind of thinking you might pursue:

I have always been interested in the ways in which leaders guide their organizations through times of change. From reading the RPZ scenarios, it appears that this company is in exactly that kind of situation, having acquired a company that immediately increases its size and reach. On the other hand, it is a situation that could lead to internal conflicts, and could be very difficult to manage. What are the most important things that a leader needs to pay attention to in a situation like this? That’s what I’d like to find out more about.

Work through the “Defining Your Topic” section of the Library Research and Information Literacy Skills resources in iGuide. Try both the mind-mapping approach, and the search approach for defining your topic.

Sample Topic Areas

Topics to consider might include the following:
•The importance of strategic planning for acquisitions.
•Deciding to acquire a company or compete with it.
•The decision to supplement consulting staff by outsourcing.
•The viability of training to development additional consulting resources.

Instructions

Select a topic area that interests you, either one of those listed or your own idea. Begin your assignment by providing your answers to the following questions:
1.How would you describe your area of greatest interest in the RPZ case? •Sample response: I would like to know what works—what makes leaders successful in situations like this.

2.What ideas, factors, or issues do you believe are most closely related to this area of interest? •Sample response: I think there are a lot of factors that leaders have to be concerned about, including how to structure the merged company, who should be in charge of what, how to keep people productive, and how to keep the company on track during the change.

3.What are you assuming is true about this situation? •Sample response: First, I’m assuming that it can be done—that some companies really do succeed at this. Second, I’m assuming that there are things that leaders can do in this situation that are more likely to result in success. I’m also assuming that others have been through this successfully, and some have written about the experience.

4.What do you think is the major aspect of this area of interest that would be worth exploring? •Sample response: I am guessing that certain decisions have to be made about people and the structure of the organization, that some kind of process should be followed, and that plans will be needed. What interests me most is how to best make those decisions about people and structure.

Compose a specific, business-related statement that you think can be argued for or against, and that will be used to guide the research.

Sample statement:

One way that organizations can continue to grow is to acquire other organizations. Even when an acquisition seems to make sense, though, putting the companies together is not an easy task, and can lead to disruptive times for both the acquirer and the acquired. Leaders of the acquiring organization have a critical role in guiding that process. The starting point for success, therefore, is the initial decisions that leaders make about people and structure.

Structure your assignment by posing each of the four questions above, followed by your response to each. Conclude by providing the statement that will guide your research.

**I hate attached RPZ Marketing background**

Based on your reading in Chapters 1-5 in Getlein’s Living with Art, respond to the TWO questions below, and then comment on two other students posts. One main post and one response post are due Thursday, and one main post and one response post are due Sunday. Your responses should be “mini-essays” ranging from 175-300 words per question. You then respond to two of your peers posts, adding to the discussion. Provide critical thought, supporting your ideas with additional examples of art (not covered in the sections we have read), scholarly quotes or new research.

In responding to the questions for each discussion board, you are expected to select specific examples of art works from the text book to illustrate and support your points—these supporting examples of art works should be different from those that the author of the course text uses when discussing similar themes or issues. Include the artist, title and page number of the each work of art you use. You may also find images of art works on the internet. If you do so, include the link and source information.

Comment on at least two of your peers’ posts (one for each main post/disucssion board); please remember to indicate to whom or to which post your peer comments are directed. Comments should be substantive, with supported critical analysis. Supported means offering specific examples of art or quotes, or historic information to support your ideas.

Try looking in other chapters of the course text, even those that are not assigned; you will find a wealth of images throughout the book. It should be part of your learning experience in this course to learn to LOOK at works of art and to see not only what the experts see, but also to experience a work of art for yourself and to discover what you find there.

Two Power Points will assist you in preparing your Discussion Board responses: “How to Write a Comparison”, in the main menu, and “How to Look at Art” in the INTERACTIVES in Unit 2.

Also, remember that if you copy or paraphrase word or ideas from the text or other sources, make sure that you follow appropriate procedures for crediting those sources. Put any quoted text in quotation marks “” and follow it with the source in parenthesis (). Citing incorrectly will reduce your grade and may be considered plagiarism. You must cite your sources in MLA format at the end of each response. Review announcements on how to cite correctly.

Finally, please note that responses that merely report back information from the text, or that do little more than repeat other students’ posts, or that quote extensively, will not receive high marks. Originality and critical thought are the goals here.

Part I: Imagine that you are in a debate with someone who asserts that, just as beauty is in the eye of the beholder, art is whatever the spectator thinks it is; there are no rules, no criteria, no universal boundaries delineating what is and what is not art, who is and who is not an artist. If something expresses or creates an aesthetic or emotional response, it is art. You must take the other side of the debate: How would you respond to and rebut the view that art is whatever the spectator thinks it is? In the first chapter of Living with Art, Getlein lists six roles that artists fulfill; these may help you in coming up with your response. Come up with points and specific examples of art works to support of the other side of the debate, which is that not just anything can be art, not just anyone can be an artist: There are established and justifiable criteria to confer that status upon objects and individuals.

Part II: In Chapter 5, Getlein covers the principles of design. For each term listed, identify an art work art included in the text, Living with Art, but NOT mentioned in either Chapter 4 or Chapter 5, that illustrates the principle in question and explain why you chose it (Note: in some cases you will find both the contrasting principles in the same work, (i.e. a painting that has both emphasis and subordination). You will have a minimum of 5 art works selected, maximum of 9. A required part of this question is to explain why you chose each work. Make sure we can “see” what you are seeing. Please include both the page number and illustration number in your response.)

unity and variety (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
symmetrical and asymmetrical balance (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
emphasis and subordination (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
scale and proportion (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
rhythm
Deadlines:
Thursday evening: Initial response
Saturday evening: Respond to two peers (100+ words per follow-up post)

REVISION!!!!

The only documentation that I need in this results portion is labeled SPSS word…everything else is a guideline of how it should be worded It will be the upload labeled SPSS word
This is just a guideline of how it should be done the actual data is in the file SPSS word….
I have provided all the data all I need you to do is put in on paper. there were 10 questions used a 2 way anova was used for the testing I just need all the stats written, It is strictly the results portion you would find in a research paper. 2×2 factorial design.
When reporting non-significant results, the p-value is generally reported as the a posteriori probability of the
test-statistic. For example: t(28) = 1.10, SEM = 28.95, p = .268.1….Reporting an omnibus oneway ANOVA, with post-hoc tests:
The analysis of variances showed that the effect of group significantly influenced anxiety, F(2, 57) =
5.00, MSE = 100.25, p = .009. Post hoc analyses were conducted using Tukey’s post-hoc test. Based on a
Tukey’s value of CD = 2.50, the anxiety in the drug group (M = 5.25, SD = 1.80) was significantly less than in
the placebo group (M = 8.35, SD = 2.68) and the control group (M = 8.10, SD = 1.69). The anxiety in the
placebo group and the drug group did not differ significantly. example of 2 way anova results Test completion times, in minutes, were submitted to a two-way ANOVA with two levels of room noise
(noisy, quiet) and two levels of room temperature (hot, cold). The main effect of room noise was significant,
F(1, 39) = 12.65, MSE = 101.55, p = .001, suggesting that the test completion time in the noisy group (M =
3.55, SD = 1.20) was greater than the quiet group (M = 2.78, SD = 0.92). The main effect of room temperature
was significant, F(1, 39) = 5.85, MSE = 101.55, p = .02, suggesting that the test completion time in the cold
group (M = 4.04, SD = 1.25) was greater than the hot group (M = 3.58, SD = 0.99). The interaction was not
significant, F(1, 39) = 1.12, MSE = 101.55, p = .296.
Reporting results of major tests in factorial ANOVA; non-significant interaction:
Attitude change scores were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance having two levels of message
discrepancy (small, large) and two levels of source expertise (high, low). All effects were statistically significant
at the .05 significance level.
The main effect of message discrepancy yielded an F ratio of F(1, 24) = 44.4, p < .001, indicating that the mean change score was significantly greater for large-discrepancy messages (M = 4.78, SD = 1.99) than for smalldiscrepancy messages (M = 2.17, SD = 1.25). The main effect of source expertise yielded an F ratio of F(1, 24) = 25.4, p < .01, indicating that the mean change score was significantly higher in the high-expertise message source (M = 5.49, SD = 2.25) than in the low-expertise message source (M = 0.88, SD = 1.21). The interaction effect was non-significant, F(1, 24) = 1.22, p > .05

here is exactly what I need done for each of the 10 different tests…..
once again this is only an example of what is expected as there was no significant main affect for any of these questions in my research paper

ANOVAs (both one-way and two-way) are reported like the t test, but there are two degrees-of-freedom numbers to report. First report the between-groups degrees of freedom, then report the within-groups degrees of freedom (separated by a comma). After that report the F statistic (rounded off to two decimal places) and the significance level.

There was a significant main effect for treatment, F(1, 145) = 5.43, p = .02, and a significant interaction, F(2, 145) = 3.24, p = .04.

INTERVIEW PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
Interview 3 friends, relatives, or teachers, and ask them about their view of origins. You must interview 1 person who disagrees with a young Earth creationist view on at least 2 of the 4 questions below.The interview questions are:
• How long are the days in Genesis 1? Why?
• How old is the Earth and life? Why?
• Did man and apes share a common ancestor? Why or why not?
• Were Adam and Eve real people? Why or why not?Based on these interviews, write a paper of 1,000–1,500 words in which you respond to each of these questions using the course materials. Format your paper according to the instructions below.Format:
1. Interview Summary (no more than 1 page, about 250 words)
• In this section, briefly summarize the answers that your interviewees gave to the interview questions. These may be in the form of a narrative or a list.
2. Interview Response (750–1,250 words)
• Go through each of the interview questions and detail how you could respond to each question using the course materials.
• For those answers from your interviewees which are different from your own view, use the course materials to respond to points of disagreement.
• Explain how the course materials can be used to respond to the questions and support the answers that you agreed with.
• Thus, this section of your paper should go through each interview question and specifically respond to it using the course materials. Your paper should demonstrate your understanding of the course materials and your ability to effectively use them to respond to questions of origins.At the end of your paper, include the total word count.Length:
Your paper must be 1,000–1,500 words, double-spaced, in 12-point Times New Roman font, and must have 1-inch margins. Title pages and reference pages do not count toward this page total. Papers may not be more than 1,500 words without prior approval from the instructor.Sources:
Interview papers may include sources in addition to the course materials. Acceptable additional sources are limited to journal articles, manuscripts, scholarly textbooks, and/or internet sites from .edu or .gov sources. Sources must be listed using current APA format in a reference page at the end of the paper.All needed readings and materials can be found in the dashboard. Login details upon acceptance

Your instructor is going to be taking the role of a Community Developer and requires your assistance in
conducting researching the groundwork in order to conduct a Life Safety Analyses of various buildings.
1. Conduct research about your occupancy, its occupants, and the egress (or life safety) of those
occupants. Provide a detailed analysis of the following: (Use Chapter 6 of the text to provide direction)
a. Discuss some of the features of NFPA 101 that make it unique, such as discussing the
classification of hazard of contents; construction requirements; protection from
hazards, detection, alarm, and notification; drills and extinguisher training; building
services, etc (other than listed in Ch. 7-10)
b. Occupant characterization – use as a guide the information from Chapter 6 of the text
and NFPA 101: 5.4.5 (with appendix)
c. Occupant reaction and response in emergency situations
d. Occupant risk factors
2. Research a fire of significance that occurred within your occupancy that you can use as a case study
a. Provide a summary of the fire of significance (its cause, reasons for occupant injuries and
fatalities)
b. Write about the fire of significance as it relates contextually to the time period. Identify some
factors that may have led to the fire (and spread) and/or the occupant fatalities.
c. What improvements have been made to prevent loss of life?
3. Develop at least two fire scenarios (as discussed in Chapter 5 of NFPA 101: Ch. 5). You will be
developing a plausible, hypothetical scenario located somewhere in your occupancy. One scenario
should be a Typical or common scenario and the other one should be a high-challenge scenario.
Included in the scenarios should be the following:
a. Ignition factors – source of ignition, material first ignited (and where it ignited for solids)
b. The maximum heat release rate for the material first ignited.
c. Occupant location in relation to the fire first ignited
4. Egress Calculations
a. Discuss what the how you would apply Fruin’s Level of Service to your occupancy (if applicable)
b. Discuss the things that would contribute to time from notification until occupants decide to take
action and time from decision to take action until evacuation commences (pre-evacuation
activity time.
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAVEN
Department of Fire Science and Professional Studies
c. Design a scenario for occupant egress and conduct a hand calculation for the time for passage.
Again, this should be a realistic scenario
Write-up
The project should be written up using a program such as PowerPoint. Refer to the format used by the
Projects at CalPoly that are posted on Blackboard. It should have diagrams, pictures, equations, and
explanations of your materials.
u have 3 options supermarkets
1 Shop Rite
2 STOP AND SHOP
3 WELLMART

using powerpoint

Dashboard info will be give upon accepting the order
The discussion definitely need to be done by the due dates! The reply can be done by Saterday
Week 1 Discussion 1
No unread replies. 5 5 replies.
To Earn Full Credit:You must have two posts in this discussion:(1) Your Initial Answer post (your answer to the discussion question) must be posted by midnight Mountain Time (MT) of Wednesday. Your Initial Answer post must be 200+ words.(2) Your Reply post (your reply to any of my posts or fellow student posts) must be posted by midnight MT of Saturday. Feel free to have your Reply post before your Initial Answer post. Your Reply post must be 50+ words.Just two posts are needed.Please share personal examples whenever possible, and please post as early in the week as possible, so our discussion can go as far as possible.Prerequisites for Marketing Success
Review the Prerequisites for Marketing Success presented in your textbook. Consider your own healthcare organization, or one with which you are familiar. Does the organization demonstrate these prerequisites? Why or why not?If not, then what might be done to get the prerequisites in place?Week 1 Discussion 2
No unread replies. 3 3 replies.
To Earn Full Credit:You must have two posts in this discussion:(1) Your Initial Answer post (your answer to the discussion question) must be posted by midnight Mountain Time (MT) of Wednesday. Your Initial Answer post must be 200+ words.(2) Your Reply post (your reply to any of my posts or fellow student posts) must be posted by midnight MT of Saturday. Feel free to have your Reply post before your Initial Answer post. Your Reply post must be 50+ words.Just two posts are needed.Please share personal examples whenever possible, and please post as early in the week as possible, so our discussion can go as far as possible.Key Learning from Week One
Think about all of your learning from Week One of the course. What do you consider your most important learning, and how would you apply this learning in management of Respiratory Care or Cardiopulmonary Services?

using just powerpoint

Your instructor is going to be taking the role of a Community Developer and requires your assistance in
conducting researching the groundwork in order to conduct a Life Safety Analyses of various buildings.
1. Conduct research about your occupancy, its occupants, and the egress (or life safety) of those
occupants. Provide a detailed analysis of the following: (Use Chapter 6 of the text to provide direction)
a. Discuss some of the features of NFPA 101 that make it unique, such as discussing the
classification of hazard of contents; construction requirements; protection from
hazards, detection, alarm, and notification; drills and extinguisher training; building
services, etc (other than listed in Ch. 7-10)
b. Occupant characterization – use as a guide the information from Chapter 6 of the text
and NFPA 101: 5.4.5 (with appendix)
c. Occupant reaction and response in emergency situations
d. Occupant risk factors
2. Research a fire of significance that occurred within your occupancy that you can use as a case study
a. Provide a summary of the fire of significance (its cause, reasons for occupant injuries and
fatalities)
b. Write about the fire of significance as it relates contextually to the time period. Identify some
factors that may have led to the fire (and spread) and/or the occupant fatalities.
c. What improvements have been made to prevent loss of life?
3. Develop at least two fire scenarios (as discussed in Chapter 5 of NFPA 101: Ch. 5). You will be
developing a plausible, hypothetical scenario located somewhere in your occupancy. One scenario
should be a Typical or common scenario and the other one should be a high-challenge scenario.
Included in the scenarios should be the following:
a. Ignition factors – source of ignition, material first ignited (and where it ignited for solids)
b. The maximum heat release rate for the material first ignited.
c. Occupant location in relation to the fire first ignited
4. Egress Calculations
a. Discuss what the how you would apply Fruin’s Level of Service to your occupancy (if applicable)
b. Discuss the things that would contribute to time from notification until occupants decide to take
action and time from decision to take action until evacuation commences (pre-evacuation
activity time.
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAVEN
Department of Fire Science and Professional Studies
c. Design a scenario for occupant egress and conduct a hand calculation for the time for passage.
Again, this should be a realistic scenario
Write-up
The project should be written up using a program such as PowerPoint. Refer to the format used by the
Projects at CalPoly that are posted on Blackboard. It should have diagrams, pictures, equations, and
explanations of your materials.