I need 3 pages essay double spaced
its about:
what does it mean to grow up and come of age in the 21st century.
if you want to write my essay i need you to contact me throw my email so i can send you the prompt.
you have 5 hours to finish it.
Select a law that has an impact on the health care industry. Examples of such laws may include access to care, discrimination, health care privacy and security, employment, etc.
Write a 1,750- to 2,100-word paper in which you discuss the impact of the selected law on health care organizational policies.
Include the following in your paper:
Format your paper according to APA guidelines.
Cite at least 4 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references.
Discuss the views of Aquinas, Agustine, and Grotius on whether deception is always bad/wrong. Discuss why the author(s) considered held the view he/they did and why the reasons you ascribe to him/them might have counted as reasons for him/them.
its an essay where i need to select one of of 5 options i would like to for for number 2 which says compare and contrast the experience of international business operating in liberal democracies and in authotitanian regimes
will be attaching the marking scheme and main question paper which says select one of of the following 5 essays ( index citation is needed with diagram also thanks )
using footnote
What Constitutes the Hierarchy of Norms in European Union Law?
Craig, P, & De Burca, G. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (2015, 6th Ed) Oxford University Press, Chapter 4
Craig, P. (2004) ‘The Hierarchy of Norms’ in Tridimas, T. & Nebbia, P. (eds.) European Union Law for the Twenty-First Century: Rethinkin the New Legal Order, Hart Publications.
Lenaerts, K. & Desoner, M. (2005) .’Towards a Hierarchy of Legal Acts in the European Union? Simplification of Legal Instruments and Procedures’ ELJ 11: 744
Prior to the Lisbon Treaty the legal acts of the Union was represented by the Treaties and Derived Legislation from the Treaties. After Lisbon there became a formal hierarchy of norms, which existed before but not formally. This hierarchy is as follows:
Treaties and the Charter of Rights;
General Principles of Law;
Legislative Acts; and
Delegated Acts and Implementing Acts.
A Legal Norm, as conceived here:
1) It may apportion norm-making competence among persons in the EU; e.g. consider here how the Member States confer powers onto the Union Institutions.
2) It may regulate the procedure to be followed in creating Norms; e.g. how the derived law is formed by developing the aims and objectives in the Treaties.
3) It may limit the content for valid norms; i.e. limitations on legislative acts.
There are therefore a number of issues that can been considered for the assignment.
Consider the hierarchy of norms as listed above, i.e. from Treaties to legislative and non-legislative acts.
Consider how the Member States confer, on the EU, norms in the form of competences.
Consider how the hierarchy of norms became part of the Lisbon Treaty, e.g. sought the objectives of simplification, democratic legitimacy, and separation of powers against institutional balance. See Final Report of Working Group IX on Simplification, attached below.
Consider how the general principles of law govern the creation of legislative and non-legislative acts, or take justice one of the general principles including:
Subsidiarity, Proportionality, Legal Certainty, Legitimate Expectations, Equality, Precautionary Principle, or Procedural Justice.
Fundamental Principles of Human Dignity (right to life, etc.); Freedom (right to liberty, private life, protection of personal data); Equality (non-discrimination); Solidarity (worker’s right); Citizen Rights; and Justice (effective remedy, fair trial). How do these feed into the legislative and non-legislative law? How do they affect the relationship between the Union and Its Member States.
Consider what constitutes the non-legislative act, i.e. delegated acts (Art. 290 TFEU) and Implementing Acts (Art. 291 TFEU) This particularly refers to delegation of Power. How does this differ from comitology? See Case C-427?12 Commission v European Parliament and Council
Ultimately the binding force of all such norms derives from the basic norm of the particular legal system. So if you wished to consider Kelsin’s legal science, from which the ideas of the hierarchy of norms principally come you could; you would just then need to link it to the EU.
Compare and Contrast Paper
For your final 4-6 page (double-spaced) paper, due on the last day of class, you will write a compare and contrast paper on the theme of naming and identity. Pick two or more texts we have done in this class from Alice in Wonderland onward and consider the ways in which they use names, or namelessness, as a way of manifesting questions of self, identity, personhood, otherness, and/or rites of passage.
In Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass, for example, Alice wonders if she can still be the same person if she does not remember all she used to know and wonders if she might be Mabel; in Through the Looking-Glass, she wanders into the Wood with No Names and encounters a fawn, and the prelapsarian peace and innocence they find together suggest that it is by naming things, and thereby separating ourselves from others, that we fall into sin and pain.
In The Importance of Being Earnest, characters assume false identities and must merge their fictional and real selves before they marry—though interestingly, it is the invented, fictional selves which turn out to be the true ones (perhaps reflection Wilde’s own double life as a married man in the country and a gay man in the city).
In the Prologue to Invisible Man, the narrator—usually referred to as “Invisible Man”—feels invisible and nameless not because he is a specter, but because he is not seen or recognized as a human in the world controlled by whites. He feels more like a ghost.
In Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral,” the narrator, his wife, and her first husband are not named in the story, and for most of the story, the narrator refers to Robert as “the blind man,” robbing him of personal identity. Here the lack of names seems to indicate the narrator’s interior blindness, his inability to see from other perspectives and open himself up to experience. Interestingly, as he comes closer to gaining insight and a truer vision, he begins to describe details around him, as though his interior blindness is gradually fading.
In “No Name Woman,” the nameless aunt is likewise referred to as a “ghost” and becomes nameless because she is outside the norm of society and no longer recognized as a person. Later, Kingston will refer to white people she encounters as ghosts, a reversal of Ellison’s construction, but once again it is because she is an outsider.
In such texts as The Woman Warrior, the “Prologue” to Invisible Man, and “Cathedral,” the theme of naming and namelessness also involves a consideration of otherness, prejudice, and judgment, among other things. In The Importance of Being Earnest and Alice in Wonderland, finding oneself means also finding out one’s true name and identity, and perhaps fashioning oneself anew in a rite of passage—becoming a queen, and thus symbolically growing up in Through the Looking-Glass, or getting married, as in The Importance of Being Earnest (and, of course, the women therein will also get new names when they marry.
Compare / Contrast Thesis, Outline, and conclusions
A thesis statement is a sentence (or sentences) that expresses the main idea of your essay and answers the question or questions posed by that essay. It offers your readers a quick and easy to follow summary of what you will discuss and what you as a writer are setting out to tell them. Thesis statements generally consist of two parts: your topic and the analysis, explanation(s), or assertion(s) that you’re making about the topic. It is a very specific statement—it should cover only what you want to discuss in your essay and be supported with specific evidence. Generally, a thesis statement appears in the introduction of your essay so that your audience will have a clear idea of what to expect as they read. You can think of your thesis as a map or a guide both for yourself and your audience.
Start by jotting down similarities and differences between your two chosen texts, paying particular attention to their use of names or namelessness, mistaken identities, identity shifts, or ghosts. Make a list of the ways their images are similar and how they differ from one another. Then examine your lists. Do they have more similarities than differences? Why do you think that is true? This will be the basis of your paper.
When you are done, time yourself for five minutes and condense all of what you have written down into a single sentence that summarizes what you have found. This will form the basis of your thesis statement. Recast it so it contains a main idea as well as three specific examples or areas of focus that illustrate your idea. For example, an essay on dreams and literature—as opposed to your topic, names and identity—might look like this: “At times the narratives of both Lewis Carroll and Nathaniel Hawthorne contain dream symbolism such as X, Y, and Z, but Carroll’s dream-vision remains essentially more absurd and free-floating, whereas in Hawthorne’s tale, the symbols approach the coherence of a distinct allegory.”
1) Paragraph One: Introduction. Say what you’re going to compare and contrast in a brief overview of your argument. Include a thesis statement that contains 3 major similarities / differences between the texts and why you think this is so.
2) Paragraph Two: Element A. Discuss the first similarity or difference you noticed, giving examples from your reading.
3) Paragraph Three: Element B. Discuss the second similarity / difference.
4) Paragraph Four: Element C. Discuss the third similarity / difference.
5) Paragraph Five: Conclusion. What has been revealed from comparing and contrasting these two texts?
Tips for Writing Compare and Contrast Papers
Check your paper for errors.
Avoid the tennis match approach. In other words, don’t discuss Carroll in one paragraph, Carver in the next, and then go back to Carroll in the subsequent paragraph as though you were hitting a ball back and forth across a net. Instead, discuss both texts in every paragraph and, as often as possible, in the same sentence.
Banish unnecessary summaries. Only discuss plot elements absolutely essential to your discussion. To avoid summaries if you find you tend to do them in your papers, try discussing elements of a text out of order—the end first, the beginning second, or so forth.
Thinking Contrariwise: Use words and phrases such as similarly, likewise, like, same, on the contrary, conversely, on the other hand, in contrast, and unlike in a c/c paper.
Qualify your statements when necessary.
Anticipate Counter-Arguments: If you see any possible objections to your point if view, acknowledge them, say what merit they may have, and then refute them by saying why you think your p.o.v. is still correct.
Writing Conclusions:
Your conclusion should reiterate your thesis and the main points of your essay, but it differs from an introduction by bringing all these details together and conveying a sense of closure. Don’t just recast your introduction in different words. In your conclusion, you could, for example,
●Place your discussion in a larger context and suggest the broader implications of your argument
●Address ideas from a fresh perspective in order to encourage your reader to continue thinking about your topic
●Raise unanswered questions
●Pose a question for future study
●Describe qualifications to your argument
●Include something from the intro in a different light to bring the paper full circle
●Derive a general principle
●Ask a provocative question
●Set a scene
●Redefine one of the key terms of your argument
●Speculate on what might happen next
●Give an example
●Evoke a vivid image
●Give an unusual fact
●Draw an analogy
●Connect your subject with a historical event or current trend
●Formulate a hypothesis
●Introduce a relevant quotation
●Link your essay to larger issues
i need essay on the specific question below
Explore the urban experience in movie Blade Runner.
note: kindly uses examples from movie itself and should have clear thesis statement
You are a biomedical engineer working in the Research and Development Division of a company in the cardiovascular prostheses field. Your project is to design a blood compatible material for vascular prostheses.
a. What characteristics should this material have?
b. The implant must be designed to last for a minimum of 3 years in-vivo. There are 2 major mechanisms of chemical degradation of polymers in-vivo. Describe each of these mechanisms. Given the following polymers, indicate whether they are susceptible to hydrolysis, oxidation, both or neither of these processes.
Poly(carbonate urethane) Poly(ether urethane)
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Polyethylene (linear)
Polytetrafluoroethylene
c. Choose one of these materials for your new heart valve material. Justify your choice.
d. Discuss the factors that influence cell adhesion to biomaterials surfaces.
e. How could you modify the surface of this material to improve its haemocompatibility?
Discuss whether George Washington was a good first president based on his pre presidency activities and term in office.
Using feedback from your professor and classmates, revise Parts 1 and 2, and add Part 3. Plan to include visuals to illustrate the advantages of your proposed solution.
Write an eight to ten (8-10) page paper in which you:
Provide Part I: Revision of A Problem Exists (3-4 pages)
Provide Part 2: Revision of Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages (3-4 pages)
Develop Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals (1-2 pages, for 7-9 total pages)