Author: chris

Dear writer This is for the exam preparation. Past paper questions. please help me to write
2 topic essay around 800 words each.
The past paper questions just a guide for you to write this essay and to conduct the essay in a whole covering these area questions. Thanks
NOT SEPARATELY ANSWER EACH QUESTION !!

Reference please use from the reading list you can just pick up each topic essay at least 5 references
Thanks

Topic 1 Sustainable Development
– 2014 Sustainable Development is an oxymoron (or a contradiction in terms). Discuss.
– 2013 Sustainable Development is an oxymoron (or a contradiction in terms). Discuss.
– 2012 Explain how United Nations summits have attempted to deliver global sustainable
development. How successful have they been, and what have been the barriers to success?
– 2011 Discuss the development of the concept of sustainable development on the international
stage, paying particular attention to tension that have arisen between different approaches and/
or interests.
– 2010 Discuss the development of concepts of sustainable development and sustainability from
1972 onwards, paying attention to some of the tensions that emerged.
Topic 2 Climate Change
– 2014 Why has it been so difficult to achieve scientific consensus with respect to anthropogenic
climate change post-1945?
– 2014 Discuss the effectiveness of the Kyoto process in addressing the threat of anthropogenic
climate change?
– 2013 Critically evaluate the way in which a scientific consensus concerning anthropogenic
climate change emerged during the course of the twentieth century.
– 2012 Discuss the ethical issues surrounding climate change mitigation and adaptation.
– 2011 Al Gore stated that climate change is ultimately a moral issue. Why is this so, and what
responses are appropriate?
– 2010 Discuss the ethical issues surrounding climate change mitigation and adaptation/mitigation
responses to it.

Dear writer This is for the exam preparation. Past paper questions. please help me to write
2 topic essay around 800 words each.
The past paper questions just a guide for you to write this essay and to conduct the essay in a whole covering these area questions. Thanks
NOT SEPARATELY ANSWER EACH QUESTION !!

Reference please use from the reading list you can just pick up each topic essay at least 5 references
Thanks

Topic 1 Sustainable Development
– 2014 Sustainable Development is an oxymoron (or a contradiction in terms). Discuss.
– 2013 Sustainable Development is an oxymoron (or a contradiction in terms). Discuss.
– 2012 Explain how United Nations summits have attempted to deliver global sustainable
development. How successful have they been, and what have been the barriers to success?
– 2011 Discuss the development of the concept of sustainable development on the international
stage, paying particular attention to tension that have arisen between different approaches and/
or interests.
– 2010 Discuss the development of concepts of sustainable development and sustainability from
1972 onwards, paying attention to some of the tensions that emerged.
Topic 2 Climate Change
– 2014 Why has it been so difficult to achieve scientific consensus with respect to anthropogenic
climate change post-1945?
– 2014 Discuss the effectiveness of the Kyoto process in addressing the threat of anthropogenic
climate change?
– 2013 Critically evaluate the way in which a scientific consensus concerning anthropogenic
climate change emerged during the course of the twentieth century.
– 2012 Discuss the ethical issues surrounding climate change mitigation and adaptation.
– 2011 Al Gore stated that climate change is ultimately a moral issue. Why is this so, and what
responses are appropriate?
– 2010 Discuss the ethical issues surrounding climate change mitigation and adaptation/mitigation
responses to it.

1- write as simple as you can.
2-What is most important in these assignments is grasping the legal principles and supporting your position with the case law cited in the notes.
3-the notes will be attached, to relay on when citing information.
4-And remember- you must reference the cases in notes if there is any and cite them. If my answers do not cite any cases, i will automatically lose 10 points.

question:

Read carefully and then provide a decision in the following hypothetical case. Make sure you provide a thorough discussion of the legal principles involved, and the case law upon which you are relying to support your decision.

. Gentry was the owner of a farm over which the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and its employees had a right of way. Gentry became very upset and irritated whenever the TVA employees exercised their right to walk or drive through his farm which some of them did on a daily basis in order to get to and from work. Gentry repeatedly complained to TVA about what he considered to be the unauthorized use of his property by its employees and even took the matter to civil court where his case was promptly dismissed. Upon leaving the courthouse, Gentry angrily stated his intentions to kill any TVA employees who came on his property.

Approximately four weeks after Gentry lost his court case he called 911 to complain that TVA employees were making noises as they passed through his farm. The next day, while in the farm he observed a TVA vehicle enter his land and returned to his residence, armed himself and stood waiting near the barn for its arrival. He called a friend on his cell phone stating “he did not know what he would do if TVA trespassed on his land today.”

Brewster, who was driving the TVA vehicle soon approached the barn and Gentry stepped out into the driveway causing Brewster to bring the vehicle to a halt. Brewster put his head out of the driver’s window and attempted to talk to Gentry but the latter put his rifle within 3 or 4 inches of Brewster’s face and told him to use the road and stay off his property. When Brewster attempted to push the barrel aside, Gentry immediately fired several shots. Brewster was shot five times and died from gunshot wounds to the head and chest.

At his trial, Gentry’s mother testified that her son had been continuously tormented by the TVA employees who insisted on trespassing on his property although he had warned them not to do so on several occasions.

Gentry was convicted of first-degree murder and appeals claiming that the evidence did not establish that he meant to cause the death of the victim. He also alleged that the trial judge erred and misdirected himself when he refused to provide the jury with an instruction for the lesser-included offense of manslaughter.

Provide a decision in this appeal based on general provisions of state murder statutes.

Would your decision be different under the relevant provisions of the Model Penal Code?

Lab Report Structure
1. Aim & objectives of the experiment
 Explain the aim & objectives of the experiment.
2. Introduction
 Mention the experiment.
 Explain the principle of the experiment.
3. Equipment used
 List the equipment you used.
4. Safety
 Did you consider any safety issues while carrying out the
experiment? Explain.
5. Method
 Provide any ray diagrams or diagrams that you used.
 Explain the formula and terms used with appropriate units.
 Explain the procedure.
6. Results
 Include the tables.
 Attach the relevant graphs.
 Show the working for each type of calculation.
7. Uncertainties
 Explain the uncertainty involved in the experiment.
 Error analysis should be provided here.
8. Discussion
 Discuss your result
Relate your findings to the theory.
What result did you expect? What did you get? If you got
unexpected result what went wrong? How it could have been
rectified.
9. Conclusion
 Give your conclusions.
10.References & Bibliography
 List the references you used (books, websites etc.). Harvard
referencing should be used. Don’t forget the citation. Also, include
all the other sources consulted, even if not directly cited in the
report.
Note:
 Read your report and use spell check.
 Do not cut and paste from websites.
 Don’t forget to provide references

About this experiment：
Experiment 1: Diffraction Grating.
Caution. Follow the specific instructions you are given about working safely with laser
light.
You are provided with a laser light source, and two diffraction gratings. One grating has
known line spacing. Task 1 is to use the grating with the known spacing to determine
the wavelength of the laser light. Task 2 is to work out the spacing on the unknown
grating, using the value of λ found in task 1.
For a diffraction grating nλ = dsinθn
where n is the order of the maximum,
λ is the wavelength,
d is the slit spacing of the grating and
θn is the angle between the direction of the central beam and the direction of the
nth maximum.
Task 1
1. Set up the apparatus to produce an interference pattern on the screen.
2. Draw a labelled sketch of your experiment.
3. Indicate, by labels or explanation, how you will obtain n, d, and θn for each
maximum you investigate
4. List the measurements required.
5. Draw a suitable table for your results.
 Include quantities, units and uncertainties in the table headings.
6. Take measurements and record them in the table
7. Plot a suitable graph and use the gradient to find λ.
To find the wavelength of the light
n X (unit) tanθ = x/y θ(unit) sinθ
1 1.4cm 0.035 2.004 0.035
2 2.6cm 0.065 3.719 0.065
3 3.9cm 0.097 5.540 0.096
4 5.2cm 0.13 7.407 0.129
5 6.5cm 0.16 9.090 0.158

8
n is the order
y is the distance between the grating and screen
x is the distance between the central maximum and nth maximum
λ = d sinθ /n
{sinθ/n is obtained from the graph}

Details:

The PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Review the PICOT article \”Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Asking the Clinical Question: A Key Step in Evidence-Based Practice\” along with the \”Chapter 18: Using Research in Evidence-Based Nursing Practice\” PowerPoint resource.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://gateway.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00000446-201003000-00028&D=ovft&PDF=y

The first step of the EBP process is to develop a question from the practice problem you drafted in Topic 1. Start with the patient and identify the clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. Consider the research and writing you completed in Topics 1-4.

Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT statement in an area of interest to you, which is applicable to your proposed capstone project.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS433V.R.UsingResearchEvidenceBasedNursingPractice_student.pptx

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the \”Submit\” button under \”Final Submission\” is clicked.

New Attempt

TitleAttached DocumentsTurnitin ReportSimilarity IndexFinal Submission Click \’New Attempt\’ to start assignment or attach documents

1- write as simple as you can.
2-What is most important in these assignments is grasping the legal principles and supporting your position with the case law cited in the notes.
3-the notes will be attached, to relay on when citing information.
4-And remember- you must reference the cases in notes if there is any and cite them. If it don\’t cite any cases, i will automatically lose 10 points.

question:

Read carefully and then provide a decision in the following hypothetical case. Make sure you provide a thorough discussion of the legal principles involved, and the case law upon which you are relying to support your decision.

Gentry was the owner of a farm over which the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and its employees had a right of way. Gentry became very upset and irritated whenever the TVA employees exercised their right to walk or drive through his farm which some of them did on a daily basis in order to get to and from work. Gentry repeatedly complained to TVA about what he considered to be the unauthorized use of his property by its employees and even took the matter to civil court where his case was promptly dismissed. Upon leaving the courthouse, Gentry angrily stated his intentions to kill any TVA employees who came on his property.

Approximately four weeks after Gentry lost his court case he called 911 to complain that TVA employees were making noises as they passed through his farm. The next day, while in the farm he observed a TVA vehicle enter his land and returned to his residence, armed himself and stood waiting near the barn for its arrival. He called a friend on his cell phone stating “he did not know what he would do if TVA trespassed on his land today.”

Brewster, who was driving the TVA vehicle soon approached the barn and Gentry stepped out into the driveway causing Brewster to bring the vehicle to a halt. Brewster put his head out of the driver’s window and attempted to talk to Gentry but the latter put his rifle within 3 or 4 inches of Brewster’s face and told him to use the road and stay off his property. When Brewster attempted to push the barrel aside, Gentry immediately fired several shots. Brewster was shot five times and died from gunshot wounds to the head and chest.

At his trial, Gentry’s mother testified that her son had been continuously tormented by the TVA employees who insisted on trespassing on his property although he had warned them not to do so on several occasions.

Gentry was convicted of first-degree murder and appeals claiming that the evidence did not establish that he meant to cause the death of the victim. He also alleged that the trial judge erred and misdirected himself when he refused to provide the jury with an instruction for the lesser-included offense of manslaughter.

Provide a decision in this appeal based on general provisions of state murder statutes.

Would your decision be different under the relevant provisions of the Model Penal Code?

Submit a research question that will be answered using a qualitative approach. Write a short paragraph, indicating the population you are interested in studying, the setting, and the research method you will use. Justify your use of method. Provide few questions that will help you answer your research question, keeping in mind the method you will be using.
start answering the above then introduction ….etc
I want the intro and method

develop a quantitative research proposal. This assignment is to set the stage for the proposal. You need to select a research topic and write an introduction for your research proposal. To make planning for the second assignment easier here are some guidelines and the criteria we will use for determining the grade.
1) The assignment should consist of: a) Introduction including problem statement; b) Significance of the problem or issue chosen to public health; and c) The research question and study objectives;
2) Remember that the research question and objectives may evolve over time so this is not the last chance to refine these;
3) You should start very generally about the importance of the field and then move to the more specific gap you are addressing in the study and then your research question and objectives;
4) You don’t need to refer specifically or extensively to the literature (you will do that in the literature review) but you need to try to frame your study in the context of the general literature on that field. There are some examples of problem statements from published articles available on Moodle. If you do choose to cite some references, you need to provide a bibliography of any references cited and you will need to do that for every assignment.
5) Length: The length of the assignment is difficult to specify because it will depend in part on how complicated the problem is, how much literature there is on it and your group discussions. However, a rough guide would be one page double-spaced (with a maximum of 2 pages). [You may want to expand it further for your final proposal, but for this assignment that is sufficient].
Criteria for grading:
• How well it sets out the problem area
• Relevance to public health well stated
• How convincing the arguments are
• Clarity of presentation/writing
• At least one reference should be cited to support the points made

Research paper topic is \”Chinese food and Japanese food: Similarities and Differences\”

Consider the ethics case about blown insulation and bronchial irritationPreview the documentView in a new window. Assume the role of Susan Taggert. Using the ethics procedure discussed in class, choose an audience and craft a message to them in the appropriate form about what should be done next. Based on our discussion of formal business letters, memos, and emails, select the appropriate communication form for the situation. Use the \”discussion\” portion of your communication to justify and support your ethical recommendation. Submit your correspondence here, in Word format.